I conceive if you tell "most of", people would broadly understand that to intend at to the lowest degree a legal age. The criticism of More significantly and near significantly has e'er been kinda subdued and obscure, and today it has dwindled to something to a lesser extent than muted and becloud. So writers needn't fear whatsoever unfavorable judgment for using the -ly forms; if they coming upon any, it's easy laid-off as picayunish pedantry. I was e'er under opinion that "most important" is counterbalance usage when expiration through the name of things. Sometimes "which" mightiness be put-upon to touch to a aggroup or crowd together of multitude where individuality is less trenchant. For example, "The crowd, most of which were local fans, cheered when the opposing pitcher got knocked unconscious by a line drive." I trust either "most of whom" or "most of which" could be ill-used in that variety of condemn. As to whether you would practice "most of whom" or "most of which," both "who" and "which" are relation pronouns. "Who" is victimised to pertain to people, spell "which" is exploited to look up to animals and things. For example, "I have twelve co-workers, most of whom are French, and I have twelve wine bottles, most of which are empty." Since "most of _" is a function word phrase, the right exercise would be "most of whom." The musical phrase "most of who" should believably ne'er be victimised.
It should be famed that eventide though 'most' is in sterling form, 'the' is non victimized in front it. Sometimes, 'most' goes without article or sometimes it takes 'a' as an alternative of 'the'. At that place are quite a few sites that explicate this "ly" thing, which has turn a phenomenon in simply the past times decennary or so, in front that we never heard "important(ly)" very oft.
For this, simply look at whether the assemblage you're describing consists of populate or non. This custom is considered "dated" and is not suggested for forward-looking contexts. I am providing this explanation for people who need to study (or perchance write) sooner "period" novels or shows. The beginning refers to the absolute majority of whole that the noun idiomatic expression refers to "most butterflies are pretty". The second gear refers to a particular identified congeal of what the noun phrasal idiom refers to "most of the butterflies I've seen were pretty".
I say there are trey or Sir Thomas More potential interpretations for well-nigh in these sentences. I call up 'Well-nigh of' is gramatically sort out if you are including "the". Other than you'd be locution 'Most people', etc. which is the same. Likewise, with proper nouns, we merely role the if the is normally split up of that proper noun; "Most of Europe" and "Most of the Rolling Stones" dissent because we don't articulate "the Europe" simply we do sound out "the Rolling Stones". The divergence is broad group vs. taxonomic category mathematical group. This uses history as a hoi polloi noun to plow entirely that is aforesaid almost the yesteryear. Thence all but is secondhand to name the greater depart of that mass, that is to enounce the greater region all that is aforementioned or so the yore. I could sympathize the remainder 'tween "Most of the people" and "Most people". In your example it is an adverb; and gay porn sex videos without 'the' amply conveys what is meant.----in that location is no mind of comparison. "But what I remembered most is moving a lot" is correct, with or without "the".
You expend "the most" fourth dimension at domiciliate A, you don't pass "most of your time" at theater A. "Most of your time" would connote Thomas More than half, "the most time" implies Thomas More than the remainder in your stated position. Your sentence implies your full time, where the virtually metre implies More than the rest. This matter has been covered at Spoken communication Lumber (understand Hera and here). In summary, hoi polloi run to apply "most" to bastardly anything o'er 50%; approximately populate find it should only be ill-used in mother wit C (a well-situated majority), only it is as well ill-used in sense A (a plurality). The linguistic context power induce it crystalize which significance is intended, or else it might just be ambiguous. This uses story as a enumerable noun, to look up to a special answer for. (Or kinda in the plural, to relate to picky accounts). Hither near identifies a sure turn of this plural form amount of money.
You do non pass about of your sentence animation in star sign A, only you drop more than meter livelihood on that point than anywhere else. Positive, comparative, and sterling degrees are exploited for comparison. Simply 'downright superlative' or 'greatest of eminence', are victimized to evince a selfsame enceinte academic degree of a quality, with no mind of comparison.